Carbon Border Adjustments

Walking the Talk Why USAID Contractors Should Care About Carbon Footprints

Walking the Talk: Why USAID Contractors Should Care About Carbon Footprints?

US Government’s OASIS+ Contract Vehicle Promotes Sustainability and Reducing Greenhouse Gas Emissions As the world grapples with the effects of climate change, governments, and organizations are increasingly focusing on reducing greenhouse gas emissions and promoting sustainability. The US government is no exception and has taken steps to address climate change through various initiatives, including the OASIS+ contract vehicle. This contract vehicle, developed by the General Services Administration (GSA), streamlines access to professional services, including sustainability-related services like carbon footprint management. US Government Agencies Now Require Scope 1 and 2 Disclosures from Contractors for Sustainability Initiatives Many US government agencies, such as EPA (Environmental Protection Agency), DOD (Department of Defense), and USAID (United States Agency for International Development), are now requesting Scope 1 and 2 disclosures from their contractors as part of their sustainability initiatives. Scope 1 emissions are directly generated by an organization, while Scope 2 emissions are indirect emissions generated by the organization’s consumption of purchased electricity, heat, or steam. Disclosure of Scopes 1 and 2 Emissions Helps Contractors Reduce Carbon Footprint and Boosts Business Performance Disclosing Scopes 1 and 2 emissions can help contractors identify opportunities for carbon footprint mitigation, crucial to reducing greenhouse gas emissions and slowing down global warming. In addition to reducing climate impact, a study by the UN found that companies that disclose their climate performance have a 67% higher return on equity than those that do not. This suggests that reducing carbon footprint can lead to lower operating costs, improved efficiency, and a more competitive market position. Emissions Reporting Crucial for Contractors Seeking Government Contracts, Particularly with USAID’s Focus on Sustainable Development Reporting on emissions can also improve contractors’ climate performance, which is increasingly important to many government agencies when evaluating contractors. This is particularly relevant to USAID, which invests millions of dollars in international aid to promote sustainable development in emerging economies. USAID contractors should therefore be accountable for their climate impact to demonstrate a commitment to sustainability. Partner with Green Initiative to Reduce Carbon Footprint and Improve Sustainability Performance: Position Yourself as a Climate Leader in International Development. Contact us Today! Green Initiative is a certification and climate advisory that specializes in helping organizations reduce their carbon footprint and improve their sustainability performance. By partnering with Green Initiative, USAID contractors can access expert advice and support to identify opportunities for carbon footprint mitigation, implement sustainability initiatives, and improve their climate performance. Green Initiative’s services can also help contractors meet the increasing demand for sustainability from government agencies like USAID and position themselves as leaders in the climate-smart international development arena. In addition to the benefits to contractors, reporting on Scopes 1 and 2 emissions can contribute to the US government’s broader efforts to address climate change. President Biden’s recent Executive Order on “Climate-Related Financial Risk” directs federal agencies, including USG contracting agencies such as USAID, to identify and disclose the climate-related financial risks their programs, assets, and liabilities face.  The Order also requires federal agencies to integrate climate-related risk analysis into their procurement processes. By disclosing their carbon footprint, USAID contractors can help federal agencies like USAID meet these requirements and contribute to the broader goal of promoting sustainability and mitigating the impacts of climate change. In conclusion, USAID contractors should walk the talk, when it comes to promoting sustainable and climate-smart development. By disclosing Scopes 1 and 2 emissions, contractors can identify opportunities for carbon footprint mitigation and improve their sustainability performance. Green Initiative can provide expert advice and support to help contractors achieve their climate-performance goals and meet the increasing demand for climate action from government agencies like USAID. Contact us today to learn how we can assist you in achieving your climate performance goals.

Walking the Talk: Why USAID Contractors Should Care About Carbon Footprints? Read More »

19-04-23 Green Initiative Post The importance of investing in carbon capture technologies

The Importance of Investing in Carbon Capture Technologies

The Earth’s natural carbon sinks: Understanding their vital role in climate change The Earth has a remarkable ability to naturally sequester carbon, through a variety of processes that occur in ecosystems including forests, grasslands, wetlands, soils, and oceans. These natural processes, also known as “sinks,” play a crucial role in removing carbon dioxide, a major greenhouse gas, from the atmosphere and storing it in the Earth’s ecosystems. Although, recent studies suggest significant carbon sinks such as the Amazonia, may no longer be capturing as much carbon as they release. (Denning, 2020) The Impacts of Climate Change on Natural Carbon Sequestration Processes: Disruptions and Consequences Rising temperatures, changing precipitation patterns, and altered ecosystems due to climate change have disrupted natural carbon sequestration processes. For example, climate-induced disturbances such as wildfires, droughts, and floods can disrupt ecosystems, leading to changes in vegetation growth, carbon storage in soils, and oceanic carbon uptake. These combined impacts of climate change and human activities are reducing the Earth’s ability to naturally sequester carbon, contributing to the increase of atmospheric carbon dioxide levels and exacerbating climate change. Exploring the Potential and Limitations of Forest Regeneration as a Climate Mitigation Strategy To counteract the negative effects associated with increasing atmospheric carbon dioxide levels, climate certification and advisory companies most commonly employ the method of forest regeneration. This method is preferred due to the limited amount of required monitoring and maintenance, the added benefits to biodiversity and soil conservation, and its cost-effectiveness. Scientists estimate forest regeneration has the potential to store an equivalent of 25% of the atmospheric carbon pool (Bastin et al., 2019). However, forest regeneration is a time-consuming process and requires large areas of land, often resulting in land-use conflicts. Furthermore, considering the UN’s ambitious goal to reach carbon neutrality by 2050, it is unreasonable to hypothesize all the carbon mitigation will occur through forest regeneration. Carbon Capture and Storage (CCS) and Bioenergy with Carbon Capture and Storage (BECCS): Potential, Limitations, and the Need for Investment Decarbonization can also take place through Carbon Capture and Storage (CCS) and Bioenergy with Carbon Capture and Storage (BECCS). These emerging technologies have the potential to help mitigate the relatively large carbon footprint of aviation, maritime, and heavy industries that are considered hard to abate, as they have limited low-carbon alternatives currently available. For example, estimates suggest that CCS has the potential to capture and store up to 45% of the CO2 emissions from industrial processes. Even in the most conservative scenarios, these technologies are expected to scale up in demand enough to remove at least 2 gigatons per annum (GTPA) of carbon dioxide by 2050. However, we are still at the very beginning of development, with CCS and BECCS requiring large amounts of energy to operate and thus, having a limited carbon capture efficiency. Analyst estimates suggest a 120-fold increase in carbon uptake needs to occur for these technologies to be viable to achieve climate goals by 2050 (McKinsey, 2022) Therefore, private investment in these technologies is essential to achieve global decarbonization as it is only through advancements in material science, manufacturing, and engineering optimizations that we achieve technological improvements. Join the Climate Champions: Partner with Green Initiative for Sustainable Solutions At Green Initiative, we strive to help our clients stay up to date with the latest developments in climate action and provide our clients with the necessary tools and knowledge to set a plan to achieve decarbonization, reduce their carbon footprint, and contribute to a sustainable future. Contact us to learn more and become a part of our climate champions! This article was writen by Marc Tristant, from the Green Inititative team. References: Bastin, J., Finegold, Y., Garcia, C., Mollicone, D., Rezende, M., Routh, D., Zohner, C. M., & Crowther, T. W. (2019). The global tree restoration potential. Science, 365(6448), 76–79. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aax0848 Denning, A. S. (2021). Southeast Amazonia is no longer a carbon sink. Nature, 595(7867), 354–355. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-021-01871-6 Scaling the CCUS industry to achieve net-zero emissions. (2022, October 28). McKinsey & Company. https://www.mckinsey.com/industries/oil-and-gas/our-insights/scaling-the-ccus-industry-to-achieve-net-zero-emissions

The Importance of Investing in Carbon Capture Technologies Read More »

15-03-23 Latin American Exporters Worried About Impacts of EU's Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism on Agricultural and Food Trade

The Potential Impact of EU’s Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism on Latin American Food Producers: Mitigation Actions and Support from Green Initiative

Latin American Food Exporters Worried About Impacts of EU’s Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism on Agricultural and Food Trade The European Union’s Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism (CBAM) has been a hot topic of discussion lately, especially for developing countries that export to the EU. The CBAM aims to prevent carbon leakage by requiring importers to pay a carbon price equivalent to that paid by EU producers, creating a level playing field for trade. However, Latin American exporters are concerned that this could put them at a disadvantage. According to a report by the Inter-American Institute for Cooperation on Agriculture (IICA), the CBAM could have significant impacts on agricultural and food trade in Latin America and the Caribbean. It could increase production costs for exporters and make their products less competitive in the EU market, potentially leading to a decline in exports and income for Latin American farmers and producers. In addition, Latin American countries are also worried about the environmental effects of the CBAM. The World Bank Group’s report on the CBAM notes that some Latin American countries are among the most vulnerable to climate change and are already experiencing its effects. Climate Mitigation Actions Latin American Food Producers Can Take to Mitigate the Impact of EU’s CBAM To help mitigate mitigate the impact of the CBAM and address the urgent need to reduce greenhouse gas emissions, food producers in Latin America can take a number of climate mitigation actions. These include: By taking these climate mitigation actions, food producers in Latin America can reduce their carbon footprint, improve the sustainability of their production practices, and prepare for the potential impacts of the CBAM. In addition, these actions can help reduce costs, increase efficiency, and enhance the resilience of food production systems in the face of climate change. Green Initiative Offers Climate Certification and Advisory Services to Help Latin American Food Producers Navigate the CBAM and Reduce their Carbon Footprint Green Initiative offers climate certification and advisory services for climate action to support Latin American food producers in reducing their carbon footprint and complying with potential future policies such as the CBAM. Their services can help identify areas where emissions can be reduced, develop strategies to implement sustainable farming practices, and implement renewable energy solutions. Additionally, their supply chain analysis services can help identify opportunities to improve supply chain efficiency and reduce carbon footprint. By working with Green Initiative, Latin American food producers can receive expert guidance to navigate the complex landscape of climate policy and sustainability standards, and position themselves for success in a rapidly changing market.

The Potential Impact of EU’s Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism on Latin American Food Producers: Mitigation Actions and Support from Green Initiative Read More »